JESUS SINNED.

“But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.” Matthew 5:28

☝☝☝Jesus has just stated that looking at a woman in lust is equal to the act of adultery itself. But what does Torah say adultery is?

“And the man that committeth [ADULTERY] WITH ANOTHER MAN’S WIFE, even he that committeth adultery with his neighbour’s wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death.” Leviticus 20:10

◄ 5003. naaph ►

Strong’s Concordance

naaph: to commit adultery

Original Word: נָאַף
Part of Speech: Verb
Transliteration: naaph
Phonetic Spelling: (naw-af’)
Definition: to commit adultery

1. literally commit adultery:

a. usually of man, always with [the] wife of another; with accusative woman, Leviticus 20:10 (twice in verse) (H), Proverbs 6:32; elsewhere absolute Exodus 20:14 = Deuteronomy 5:17 (Ten Words), Jeremiah 5:7; Jeremiah 7:9; Jeremiah 23:14; Hosea 4:2; participle masculine Leviticus 20:10 (H), Job 24:15.

b. of women, only participle
Leviticus 20:10 (H), Ezekiel 16:38; Ezekiel 23:45 (twice in verse).

☝☝☝According to Torah, adultery occurs when a man engages in CONSENSUAL sex with another man’s wife. Nonconsensual sex (by definition) is rape. Not adultery. If looking upon a woman lustfully, was by any stretch of the imagination considered sexually inappropriate, Jesus should have defined looking upon a woman lustfully (gawking), as rape, since a woman can’t necessarily control how a man looks at her.

But instead of saying, ‘whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed [rape] in his heart,’ Jesus said “…whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed ADULTERY with her already in his heart,” which makes no sense. Adultery takes place when a married woman [voluntarily] has cooperative, submissive, mutual, inclined, consenting, deliberate, willing, consensual sex with a man other than her own husband.

Not only did the New Testament messiah add to Torah, what he added makes absolutely no sense. Adultery is a mutual act which has two willing participants. And a man gawking at a woman with lust doesn’t necessarily implicate her as an accomplice to his gawking at her. To accuse a man of committing adultery for lustfully gawking at a woman, is to accuse the woman of adultery also, which (in manner of speaking) is victim blaming, since the act of adultery requires and always has at least two mutual, consenting, willing participants. What Jesus said in Matthew 5:28 is 100% NONSENSE.

Now, there are those who will insist that the bible translators made a mistake and that Matthew 5:28 should read, “But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a MARRIED woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.”

But whether the verse says the woman is married or not, it still makes absolutely no sense, because accusing a man of committing adultery for lustfully gawking at a woman, is to accuse the woman of adultery too, which is victim blaming, since the act of adultery requires and always has at least two mutual, consenting, willing participants. Hypothetically speaking, if the woman has not given her consent to be stared at lustfully, then her visual assailant (the man committing visual sexual assault), would be visually raping her; not visually committing adultery with her. The woman, whether single or married, fully covered or completely naked in the privacy of her own home, has no control over how a man out in the open, or a peeping Tom, looks at her, and a man gawking at her with lust doesn’t necessarily implicate her as an accomplice to his gawking.

☝☝☝Matthew 5:28 is utter NONSENSE whether the woman in question is married or not.

So, aside from making no sense at all, what has the New Testament messiah has done? The New Testament messiah has violated Torah by adding to it.

“Ye shall not ADD unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you. What thing soever I command you, observe to do it: thou shalt not ADD thereto, nor diminish from it.” Deuteronomy 4:2,12:32

Did the New Testament messiah add to Torah? Yes he did. And his followers proudly admit that he did. Read the following quote taken from a Christian website:

“What is Adultery?

Old Testament

“In the Old Testament, adultery was understood as sexual relations between a married (or betrothed) woman and a man other than her husband. It was therefore a sin against the husband.”

New Testament

“Jesus extended [ADDED] the definition of adultery to include sexual relations between a married man and a woman other than his wife (Mark 10:11-12, Luke 16:18). Other New Testament teachings also understand it that way (1 Corinthians 6:15-16, 1 Corinthians 7:2 ).” – copied & pasted from https://www.christianbiblereference.org/faq_adultery.htm

☝☝☝And there you have it. According to 1 John 3:4, sin is the transgression of the Law. “Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.” (1 John 3:4) And the New Testament messiah extended (added to, amended, completed, “fulfilled,” etc) already established, Mosaic instructions.

By his own admission, the New Testament messiah literally ADDED to Torah.

“Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.” Matthew 5:17

What does “to fulfil” mean in this verse? The Strong’s Concordance says:

◄ 4137. pléroó ►

Strong’s Concordance

pléroó: to make full, to complete

Original Word: πληρόω
Part of Speech: Verb
Transliteration: pléroó
Phonetic Spelling: (play-ro’-o)
Definition: to make full, to complete
Usage: I fill, fulfill, complete.

Word Origin
from plérés
Definition
to make full, to complete

So, the New Testament messiah is essentially saying, Torah was incomplete, unfinished and lacking, and he came to complete, fine tune, correct, amend, enhance, rectify, fix it, better it or finish it. The New Testament messiah’s claim is in direct conflict with the words of The Most High:

“Ye shall not ADD unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you. What thing soever I command you, observe to do it: thou shalt not ADD thereto, nor diminish from it.” Deuteronomy 4:2,12:32

The Most High Elohim of Yisrael said no one is permitted to add to or take away from His Torah, yet, adding to Torah (fulfilling, completing, etc) is precisely what the New Testament messiah stated was his purpose.

According to 1 John 3:4, transgression of the law is sin: “Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.”

Jesus SINNED. Not only did Jesus SIN – he stated out of his own mouth that his primary purpose was to violate Deuteronomy 4:2 and Deuteronomy 12:32. Who told the New Testament messiah that Torah wasn’t already fulfilled? Who told the New Testament messiah that Torah was incomplete? Who told the New Testament messiah that Torah was unfinished? According to Deuteronomy 4:2 and Deuteronomy 12:32, TORAH IS 100% COMPLETE AND 100% FINISHED. Yet, the New Testament messiah, by his own admission, came to add his own amendments to Torah. “Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.” Matthew 5:17

If 1 John 3:4 is correct: “Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law,” we have no choice but to accept the fact that JESUS SINNED. HE DECLARED THAT HE CAME TO SIN, AND DID EXACTLY THAT.

Jesus sinned on NUMEROUS occasions and Matthew 5:28 is just an example of one, along with his willfill ignorance of (and/or disregard for) the Mosiac prohibition of adding to Torah, in Deuteronomy 4:2 and Deuteronomy 12:32.

As always, it is NOT our position to see if Torah lines up with Jesus. It’s our position to see if Jesus lines up with Torah. And once again, the New Testament messiah has been found guilty of establishing his own thing.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *