Addressing Joseph, MARY’S CUCKOLD… and keep your REPLACEMENT THEOLOGY off of Genesis 3:15 😠


“And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and [HER SEED].” Genesis 3:15

Christian doctrine asserts that Genesis 3:15 is in fact a prophecy, that their messiah is to be born of the seed of a woman, without a man’s participation or involvement. There’s just one problem with this doctrine. The Christian messiah is supposed to be a descendant of Abraham, through the lineage of Mary’s cuckold, Joseph.

***We will not refer to Joseph as the Christian messiah’s “stepfather” because Joseph doesn’t fit the description of a stepfather.




a man who is the husband or partner of one’s mother after the divorce or separation of one’s parents or the death of one’s father.

Joseph DOES however, fit the description of a cuckold.



verb: cuckold

a. [to] make (another man) a cuckold by having a sexual relationship with his wife.

b. (by a man’s wife) make (her husband) a cuckold by being sexually unfaithful

“In evolutionary biology, the term is also applied to males who are unwittingly INVESTING PARENTAL EFFORT IN OFFSPRING THAT ARE NOT GENETICALLY THEIR OWN. The word cuckold derives from the cuckoo bird, alluding to its habit of laying its eggs in other birds’ nests.” – Wikipedia

☝️☝️☝️And according to Christian doctrine, GOD pulled a cuckoo on Joseph.

Joseph is not in any way the stepfather of the Christian messiah, by sheer, ice cold, raw, plain jane, definition. He IS however, Mary’s cuckold. Joseph WILLINGLY acquiesced and submitted to a spirit (I guess The Most High moonlights part time as an INCUBUS 😂😂😂) impregnating his wife, and then WILLINGLY raised his wife’s child by someone (or some thing) else.
Nevertheless, the Christian messiah was NOT of Joseph’s seed (sperm, chromosome, DNA, etc). Which begs the question: why did the writer of Matthew use Joseph’s biological lineage to link the Christian messiah to Abraham, king David and a whole list of ancestors that weren’t genetically or biologically, his?

Matthew 1:1 “The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, [ THE SON OF DAVID, THE SON OF ABRAHAM].

Matthew 1:16 And Jacob begat JOSEPH THE HUSBAND OF MARY, —> of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.”

The Christian messiah was born of Mary. Not Joseph. According to Genesis 3:15, he was born of “HER SEED,” right??? Not Joseph’s. If Christian theologians and Christian doctrine are correct in their interpretation of Genesis 3:15, the Christian messiah was to be born of the seed of a woman, WITHOUT the inclusion, chromosomes, sperm, or DNA of a man. A 100% virgin birth, Right? The birth of the Christian messiah did not involve or include the seed of a man at all. Right?? Read verse 16 as many times as necessary. Joseph was the husband of Mary. He was NOT the biological father of the Christian messiah. So WHY did the writer of Matthew spend all that time, energy and ink, documenting the lineage of Joseph if Joseph had nothing to do with the birth of the messiah? Joseph’s lineage as it pertains to the Christian messiah, is redundant, futile, irrelevant and literally UNRELATED, a complete waste of papyrus and ink. The writer of Matthew is possibly the most deceitful, disingenuous, underhanded, incompetent writer of ALL biblical writers. (But we’ll shed more light on this in a future post.) If Christian scholars are correct about Genesis 3:15 being a messianic prophecy, they should’ve made the writer of Matthew aware of this before he pinned his gospel, so he could’ve left the (irrelevant and inapplicable) lineage of Joseph (Mary’s cuckold), out of his writing. But who knows? Maybe there was a breakdown in communication.

If you are one of those who claim Mary’s lineage is the only lineage that matters (perhaps alluding to Luke 3:23-38) there’s a problem with that argument as well. Mary’s lineage goes through Nathan, the son of king David (Luke 3:31), and the biblical promise of kingship ONLY GOES THROUGH KING SOLOMON’S LINE (I Chronicles 22:5-10, I Kings 8:17-20, II Chronicles 6:7-10).

Luke 3:31 says “…Which was the son of Melea, which was the son of Menan, which was the son of Mattatha, which was the son of [NATHAN, WHICH WAS THE SON OF DAVID.]” <— The biblical promise of kingship is NOT given to the descendants of Nathan, but to the descendants of King Solomon.

So, Mary’s (supposed) lineage is 100% INAPPLICABLE, INVALID AND IRRELEVANT.

So, who is “HER seed” referring to in Genesis 3:15? HER seed is the nation of Israel. Plain and simple. “Seed” in Genesis 3:15 is plural. An example of this is found in Genesis 16:10:

“And the angel of the LORD said unto her [Hagar], I will multiply [THY SEED] exceedingly, that it shall not be numbered for multitude.” Genesis 16:10

☝️☝️☝️ The messenger of The Most High informs Hagar that He will multiply [HER SEED] exceedingly. It’s plain to see that the word [SEED] in this verse is obviously PLURAL. Eve isn’t the only woman who was given a prophecy regarding HER SEED. Hagar was given a prophecy about HER SEED, too. But Christian theologians need some prophecy (any prophecy) to validate their false messiah, so they’ll flip the word [seed] in Genesis 3:15 and insist it’s singular when it’s NOT. It’s plural, just like it’s plural in Genesis 16:10. Genesis 3:15 is NOT referring to the false messiah of Christianity. (1) Matthew’s lineage of Mary’s cuckold (Joseph) is irrelevant since he is NOT the bilogical father of christianity’s false messiah. (2) Luke’s (supposed) lineage of Christianity’s false messiah through Mary is invalid and useless, since it goes through king David’s son, Nathan, instead of Solomon <— to whose descendants the promise of Kingship is given. Christian theologians are constantly trying to FORCE and SHOEHORN their false messiah into the biblical narrative, by hook or crook; by any means necessary. But true bible students seek pure, unadulterated, TRUTH. Our business is to adjust our beliefs to what the Bible teaches, NOT to adjust what the Bible says to our beliefs. And once you find out that what you’ve been taught is undeniably and empirically FALSE, it’s your duty and responsibility to accept it and correct your course.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *