#ExposingPaulPartTwelve

Paul is a self-appointed, self-proclaimed “apostle.” In NINE of Paul’s epistles, he introduces himself as an apostle. Yes, you read that correctly. HE introduces HIMSELF as an apostle in NINE of the thirteen epistles attributed to him. Out of the 22 times Paul was referred to as an “apostle” in the Bible, it was Paul HIMSELF who referred to himself as an apostle 20 of those 22 times. Twice he was referred to as an apostle by his good friend and running mate, Luke.

“But the multitude of the city was divided: and part held with the Jews, and part with the apostles (Paul and Barnabas). Which when the apostles, Barnabas and Paul, heard of, they rent their clothes, and ran in among the people, crying out…” Acts 14:4-14

By whose authority did Luke have the right to call Paul and Barnabas, apostles? Luke had NO RIGHT to call Paul and Barnabas, apostles. None. Nevertheless, Luke called Paul and Barnabas ‘apostles’ because Paul told him they were apostles. Yup. Well, it makes NO DIFFERENCE. Because in Revelation 2:1,2, the man from Galilee made it known that they WEREN’T apostles, no matter what Paul told Luke. Not only did the rose of Sharon say Luke and Barnabas WEREN’T apostles, he called them EVIL, LIARS!

“Unto the angel of the church of [EPHESUS] write… I know thy works, and thy labour, and thy patience, and how thou canst not bear them which are EVIL: and thou hast tried them which say they are apostles, and are not, and hast found them LIARS.” Revelation 2:1,2

In the book of Acts (chapter 19) Paul arrives in Ephesus and begins preaching his gospel of grace, the annulment/abolishment of Torah and his gospel of uncircumcision in the synagogues, and the people there UNWAVERINLY DISAGREED WITH HIM Paul’s teachings:

And it came to pass, that, while Apollos was at Corinth, Paul having passed through the upper coasts came to [EPHESUS]… And he went into the synagogue, and spake boldly for the space of THREE MONTHS, disputing and persuading [debating] the things concerning the kingdom of God. But when divers [some of the men there] were hardened, and believed not, but spake evil of [that way]* before the multitude, he departed from them, and separated the disciples, disputing daily in the school of one Tyrannus.” Acts 19:1,9

☝️☝️☝️ Now, we see the attitude the men in the synagogues had toward Paul’s gospel. Mind you, the Bible translators have done something wicked in Acts chapter 19: “…when [some of the men] were hardened, and believed not, BUT SPAKE EVIL OF THAT WAY…”
☝️☝️☝️ Paul did NOT teach “The way.” The original disciples (Peter, James, John, Mark, Phillip, Thomas, etc) taught THE WAY, which they received from the man who raised Lazarus from the dead. Paul taught HIS OWN gospel of uncircumcision, annulment of Torah and his gospel of grace, which he claims he received on the road to Damascus. Paul did NOT teach “The way.” He taught HIS OWN way. And the men in the synagogues KNEW Paul wasn’t teaching “The way.”

Paul PERSECUTED Christians who were in The Way. Paul held the coats of the men who stoned Stephen for being a follower of The Way. Paul was on his way to Damascus to persecute those who were followers of The Way. Acts 9:2 and Acts 22:4

So the Bible translators of Acts 19:9 are liars. You must ask yourself: how could Paul persecute followers of The Way [Acts 9:2, Acts 22:4] if The Way (in which the author of Acts 19:9 is talking about) hadn’t YET been revealed to Paul on the road to Damascus? Paul was already persecuting followers of The Way BEFORE his conversion on the road to Damascus. So, How was Paul persecuting followers of The Way, if The Way didn’t exist until after his conversion on the road to Damascus? The answer is simple: the translators of Acts 19:9 AND Paul are liars. The men in the synagogues of Ephesus were NOT speaking evil of The Way, because Paul wasn’t teaching The Way. The truth is, the men in the synagogues of Ehpesus had some harsh words for PAUL’S own, personal doctrines, that he was trying to promote in the synagogues. But I digress…

The men of Ephesus weren’t buying Paul’s lies. And they withstood Paul’s three month tirade until he finally left. So, now you know the story behind Revelation 2:1,2.

“Unto the angel of the church of [EPHESUS] write… I know thy works, and thy labour, and thy patience, and how thou canst not bear them which are EVIL: and thou hast tried them which say they are apostles, and are not, and hast found them LIARS.” Revelation 2:1,2

Paul tried for THREE MONTHS to convince and convert the men Ephesus to his doctrines and his gospel of grace and uncircumcision, until they started CLOWNING him and letting him have it. And we’re talking about Paul and Barnabas. Paul wasn’t alone. Barnabas was with him. And Revelation 2:1,2 calls BOTH OF THEM, “EVIL, LIARS.”

And Revelation 2:1,2 specifically calls out Paul and Barnabas (the real author of Hebrews) as “them which say they are apostles….” Yes. Paul said he was an apostle. No one else called Paul an apostle; not Isaiah, not Ezekiel, not Moses, not John the Baptist, not the man from Galilee, not Daniel, not Malachi, NO ONE. ONLY PAUL HIMSELF.

None of the disciples [including Peter, James, John and Mark] ever referred to Paul as an apostle. The man who gave sight to the blind NEVER referred to Paul as his apostle.

So, tell me again why we call Paul an apostle? Paul met NONE of the qualifications to be called an apostle:

“Wherefore of these men which have companied with us all the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us, Beginning from the baptism of John, unto that same day that he was taken up from us, MUST ONE BE ORDAINED TO BE A WITNESD WITH US OF HIS RESURRECTION.” <— stop right here. THOSE ARE THE REQUIREMENTS TO BE CALLED AN APOSTLE. Read Acts 1:21,22 fifty times until it sinks in. In order to be ORDAINED an apostle, you had to follow the carpenter’s son, “Beginning from the baptism of John, unto that same day that he was taken up from us, MUST ONE BE ORDAINED TO BE A WITNESS WITH US OF HIS RESURRECTION” —> to be ordained (hold the title of) an apostle!!!!

Why do you think Paul taught so much rubbish?? He didn’t know the carpenter’s son and NEVER MET the carpenter’s son! And he didn’t have the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John to LEARN about the carpenter’s son!! And that’s why Paul made up stuff as he went along, and got caught in lie, after lie, after lie, after lie!!! Paul did NOT have a New Testament bible to read and cross-reference his doctrines. THINK!!! Paul did NOT have a New Testament Bible to fact check his doctrines. And THAT’S why he taught his OWN gospel. And THAT’S why the church in Rome called Paul out on his lies. In Romans 14:9, Paul says the son of Joseph is “Lord both of the dead and living.” <— BUT THAT IS A LIE!!!!

For to this end Christ both died, and rose, and revived, [THAT HE MIGHT BE LORD BOTH OF THE DEAD AND LIVING.]” Romans 14:9 <— LIE!!!!!!

“I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob? God is not the God of the dead, but of the living.” Matthew 22:32

“He is not the God of the dead, but the God of the living: ye therefore do greatly err.” Mark 12:27

“For he is not a God of the dead, but of the living: for all live unto him.” Luke 20:38

How many times must you see that Paul is a LIAR!!! Paul is NOT hard to be understood!? He’s just a liar!!

So, when Paul wrote to his church in Rome, telling them:

For to this end Christ both died, and rose, and revived, [THAT HE MIGHT BE LORD BOTH OF THE DEAD AND LIVING.]” Romans 14:9

and they found out he was lying, according to Matthew 22:32, Mark 12:27, and Luke 20:38, they called him out on his lies. And that’s when Paul tried to patch things up by saying,

For if the truth of God hath more abounded through [MY LIE] unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner?” Romans 3:7

Because YOU’RE A LIAR, PAUL!!! And you can’t spread Truth with LIES!!! And apparently, Paul thinks there’s nothing wrong with teaching LIES, if they successfully bring people to God!

☝️☝️☝️ The church in Rome called Paul out on his Lies (Romans 3:7). The church of Ephesus called Paul out on his lies (Revelation 2:1,2) and the Corinthian church called Paul out on his lies. FLAT OUT LIES. 2 Corinthians 12:15,16

I could go to the Greek and Hebrew to prove Paul is a STONE COLD, LIAR. But why?? When you can compare Romans 14:9 to Matthew 22:32, Mark 12:27, and Luke 20:38 to see that PAUL IS A LIAR?!? You don’t need Greek or Hebrew etymology for that? JUST COMMON SENSE AND AT LEAST A FIFTH GRADE EDUCATION.

If you still believe “apostle” Paul was a man of God, you’re in DEEP DENIAL and your cognitive dissonance is on 10,000.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *