Paul was supposed to be an expert on the Law and the Prophets. But he wasn’t. Paul was barely an amateur. We say that because Paul said things that were incorrect, which he should’ve known if he was truly an expert on the Law and the Prophets. For example, Paul said:
“Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was made of the [seed] of David according to the flesh.” Romans 1:3
But the son of God was NOT in ANY WAY made of the [seed] of David according to the flesh. And by “made of the [seed] of David according to the flesh,” Paul is saying the crucified Lord was a Maury Povich DNA test passing, blood related, family tree bearing, DNA imprinted, descendant of King David, because “seed” means, sperm. And that information is false. Yes. You can already see where we’re going with this.
Now Matthew and Luke both recorded the genealogy of the risen Savior.
Now right off the bat, Matthew and Luke’s lists contain different names. Now some people will argue that both lists are of the same men, even though their names are different. And that’s understandable. And under other circumstances, that could be the case. But the reason it’s 100% NOT the case this time is because Matthew’s genealogy list has 28 names between Joseph and King David, and Luke’s genealogy list has 40 names between Joseph and King David. So both lists cannot be of the same men; same names, different names or otherwise.
Some people argue that Luke’s genealogy list is in fact the Patriarchal genealogy of Mary, the virgin mother of the lamb that was slain. Well, that’s understandable as well. But it’s actually irrelevant. Luke’s genealogy of the man from Galilee is complete and total GARBAGE. And here’s the reason why. If you trace the genealogy of the Prince of peace using Luke’s list, it’ll take you to Nathan, the son of King David —> and then King David. <— And that right there is the problem. Luke’s genealogy of the messiah goes through the wrong son of David. The promise of Kingship (the future Kings of Israel) only goes through King Solomon —> the son of David:
“Behold, a son shall be born to thee, who shall be a man of rest; and I will give him rest from all his enemies round about: for his name shall be [SOLOMON], and I will give peace and quietness unto Israel in his days. He shall build an house for my name; and he shall be my son, and I will be his father; [AND I WILL ESTABLISH THE THRONE OF HIS KINGDOM OVER ISRAEL FOR EVER.” 1 Chronicles 22:9,10
See also 2 Chronicles 6:7-10 and 1 Kings 8:17-20
The royal lineage and promise of Kingship only goes through King Solomon, the son of David; NOT Nathan, the son of David. So Luke’s genealogy of the mighty God is 100% dead wrong and useless, and should be deleted from the Bible. It’s a easily provable LIE. And as you’re reading this, you can see for yourself that Luke’s genealogy of the meek and humble lamb, is wrong.
That leaves us with Matthew’s genealogy list. And as I said in the beginning, you can already see the direction we’re headed in, with Matthew’s list. Joseph was not the biological FATHER of the risen [seed] of Abraham. “Seed” means DNA imprinted, sperm. When you look at Biblical precedent, precepts and Biblical Case Law, the Kings of Judah often had wives of different nations, but their male offspring became King because of who the FATHER was, not the wife. The nationality of the FATHER determines whether or not the male offspring will have the right to be King. The nationality of the male offspring’s mother DOESN’T MATTER. <— That’s Biblical precedent, Biblical precept and Biblical case Law 101. Joseph may have indeed been the seed of David according to Matthew’s genealogy of the Great I am, but Joseph was NOT his biological father, making Matthew’s list redundant, unnecessary, futile, inconsequential, and a waste of ink. Again, Paul said, “Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh.” (Romans 1:3) And “seed according to the flesh” means every bit of —> SPERM PROCREATED; SPERM REPRODUCED.
If Paul was an expert on the Law and the prophets, why didn’t he know that? There are those who claim the sweet rose of Sharon was the son of David according to his mother’s flesh, but even if you use Luke’s genealogy list, it goes through the WRONG SON OF DAVID, AND 1 CHRONICLES 22:9,10 PROVES IT.
J.C. is NOT the seed of David according to the flesh and apostle Paul is a liar once again. Even if J.C. was in fact born of a virgin, according to 1 Chronicles 22:9,10 – he was born of the wrong virgin. He should’ve been born of a virgin on King Solomon’s side. Not Nathan’s. Kingship over Israel was promised to the throne of King Solomon forever. NOT NATHAN. This proves yet again, that J.C. is NOT the messiah, his mother Mary was the WRONG virgin chosen to give birth to the messiah (she was NOT descendant of King Solomon), and/or BOTH.
Prove all things.