#BarnabasAndSaulOfTarsus
#TheLyingDeceivingDynamicDuo

Allow me to make myself perfectly clear regarding blood sacrifices for the atonement of sin: the BLOOD sacrifices of the Isrealites (in the Old Testament in particular), were for unintentional sins.

Leviticus 4:2-28 and Leviticus 5:15

—> Lev 4:2,3 – Speak unto the children of Israel, saying, If a soul shall sin THROUGH IGNORANCE against any of the commandments of the LORD concerning things which ought not to be done, and shall do against any of them: If the priest that is anointed do sin according to the sin of the people; then let him bring for his sin, which he hath sinned, a young bullock without blemish unto the LORD for a sin offering.
—> Lev 4:13,14 – And if the whole congregation of Israel sin THROUGH IGNORANCE, and the thing be hid from the eyes of the assembly, and they have done somewhat against any of the commandments of the LORD concerning things which should not be done, and are guilty; When the sin, which they have sinned against it, is known, then the congregation shall offer a young bullock for the sin, and bring him before the tabernacle of the congregation.
—> Lev 4:22-24 – When a ruler hath sinned, and done somewhat THROUGH IGNORANCE against any of the commandments of the LORD his God concerning things which should not be done, and is guilty or if his sin, wherein he hath sinned, come to his knowledge; he shall bring his offering, a kid of the goats, a male without blemish: And he shall lay his hand upon the head of the goat, and kill it in the place where they kill the burnt offering before the LORD: it is a sin offering.
—> Lev 4:27,28 – And if any one of the common people sin THROUGH IGNORANCE, while he doeth somewhat against any of the commandments of the LORD concerning things which ought not to be done, and be guilty; Or if his sin, which he hath sinned, come to his knowledge: then he shall bring his offering, a kid of the goats, a female without blemish, for his sin which he hath sinned.
—> Lev 5:15 – If a soul commit a trespass, and sin THROUGH IGNORANCE, in the holy things of the LORD; then he shall bring for his trespass unto the LORD a ram without blemish out of the flocks, with thy estimation by shekels of silver, after the shekel of the sanctuary, for a trespass offering.

☝️☝️☝️ #UnintentionalSins #ThroughIgnorance

In Hebrews 9:22, our beloved brother Barnabas states:

“Without shedding of blood is no remission (of sins).”

Now, the problem with Hebrews 9:22 is that Barnabas makes NO DISTINCTION between intentional or unintentional sins. And as you just read above (Lev 4:2-28, Lev 5:15), blood sacrifices that the Levitical priests made on behalf of the children of Israel, were for the atonememt of unintentional sins. Blood sacrifices were NOT necessarily for deliberate, presumptuous, premeditated, eyes wide open, fully aware, willful, sins. And again, to make the blanket statement that “without shedding of blood there is no remission of sin” <— is FALSE. Hebrews 9:22 begs the question: without shedding of blood there is no remission of UNINTENTIONAL sin?? Or DELIBERATE, PREMEDITATED SIN?? A Christian will probably pump their fist in the air and say, “ALL SIN!!!” <— And that’s a flaming, smoking, red hot, lie. As you read above with your own eyes, (Lev 4:2-28, Lev 5:15) the BLOOD sacrifices were for unintentional sins. And this is why Barnabas and Paul are nothing more than a couple of two bit hustlers and smooth talking liars. They taught Torah to unlearned Gentiles —> #FALSELY. The Blood sacrifices of the Old Testament were for unintentional sins, and in Hebrews 9:22, Barnabas doesn’t specify whether or not there’s no remission of intentional or unintentional sins without the sheeding of blood. <— THIS is why we CAN’T AND WON’T take Hebrews 9:22 seriously. Because as a blanket statement, taken at face value, IT’S 100% FALSE.

I just thought about something. If this is your first time on this page, you might erroneously believe the only way for sins to be forgiven in the Old Testament, is by the shedding of blood. Tsk, tsk, tsk. You poor, misled, misguided thing you. I’ll go ahead and bring you up to speed just in case you haven’t read the post in which I presented multiple examples of non-blood atonements* for sin.
(1) I Kings 8:44-52 – PRAYER atones for sin, without the shedding of blood
(2) Hosea 14:2 – confession, prayer and repentance atones for sin, without the shedding of blood
(3) Psalm 69:30,31 sincere worship pleases The Most High more than blood sacrifices
(4) I Samuel 15:22 obedience is better than blood sacrifices
(5) Psalm 32:5 confession and repentance atones for sin, without the shedding of blood
(6) Exodus 30:15,16 💰 💰 💰 money can be offered as an atonement for sin, without the shedding of blood
(7) Leviticus 5:6-12 – FLOUR (yes, actual flour, the same flour in your kitchen cabinet) can be offered as a “meal offering” for the atonement for sin, without the shedding of blood
(8) Numbers 31:48-52 JEWELRY (yes, the rings on your fingers and necklaces around your neck) can be offered up as atonements for sin, without the shedding of blood

☝️☝️☝️ Blood sacrifices were NOT the only acceptable atonements for the forgiveness of sin. Barnabas (the aurhor of Hebrews) and your pastor, have both LIED TO YOU. We just presented 8 examples of sin being forgiven in the Old Testament without one drop of blood being spilled. When Barnabas said, “Without shedding of blood, there is no remission of sins,” <— HE LIED. And we just presented to you —> 8 precepts which testify that Hebrews 9:22 IS A LIE, LIE, LIE. Jesus did NOT need to die for ANYONE’S sins. Why? Because blood sacrifices WEREN’T the only way for sins to be forgiven. It was NOT NECESSARY for the Christian messiah to shed his blood for ANYONE’S sins. Blood sacrifices weren’t the ONLY form of atonement for the forgiveness of sins. And we just gave you 8 places in the bible ☝️☝️☝️which PROVE that the man from Galilee laying down his life for the sins of mankind, WAS A COMPLETELY UNNECESSARY SACRIFICE.

Hopefully you’re brought up to speed with us now. Let’s continue!

Let’s take it one step further. SIN is defined as the transgression of the Law:

—> I John 3:4 – “Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.”

☝️☝️☝️this is the widely accepted definition of sin. However, Barnabas and Saul of Tarsus have both said, the Law is done away with. If Saul of Tarsus and Barnabas are in fact correct that the law has been done away with, and I John 3:4 is also correct, that sin is the transgression of the law, sin must (for the sake of continuity) also be done away with.

But sin is not done away with. All Christians SIN. Which explains the need for their ‘Grace’ doctrine. Because if Christians didn’t sin, they wouldn’t need GRACE. You say I’m wrong?? I’m NOT wrong. Because if sin is the transgression of the law, and the law was done away with, sin too (as a natural consequence of doing away with the law) is also done away with. And if sin is done away with (sin, which is the transgression of the law, which has been done away with), then GRACE (as a consequence of doing away with the law) is also done away with.

If the death, burial and resurrection of the messiah did away with the law and sin (because sin is the transgression of the law which was done away with), GRACE IS OBSOLETE. There’s no need for grace. Because sin (which is the transgression of the law) was done away with when the law was done away with. READ IT AGAIN:

—> I John 3:4 – “Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.”

Eliminating the law, eliminates sin, which eliminates GRACE.

—> Romans 5:13 For sin was in the world before the law was given; but sin is not taken into account when there is no law.

—> Romans 4:14,15 – For if those who live by the law are heirs, faith is useless and the promise is worthless, because the law brings wrath. AND WHERE THERE IS NO LAW, THERE IS NO TRANSGRESSION.

☝️☝️☝️ Saul of Tarsus has made it unequivocally clear that where there is no Torah, there is no transgression.

☝️☝️☝️ Since, according to Barnabas and Saul of Tarsus, the law is done away, sin too has to be done away (because sin is the transgression of the law), which naturally makes GRACE obsolete, null, void, useless, worthless, nugatory, pointless. You DON’T need grace where there’s no sin, because there’s no law. Read it AGAIN:

—> I John 3:4 – sin is the transgression of the law.
—> Romans 4:15 where there is no law, there is no transgression.

—> II Cor 3:7 – But if the ministration of death, written and engraven in stones (TORAH), <— [WAS GLORIOUS], so that the children of Israel could not stedfastly behold the face of Moses for the glory of his countenance; ☝️☝️☝️[WHICH GLORY WAS TO BE DONE AWAY]
—> II Cor 3:13 -And not as Moses, which put a veil over his face, that the children of Israel [could not stedfastly look to the end of THAT WHICH IS ABOLISHED].
—> Eph 2:15 – Having ABOLISHED in his flesh the enmity, EVEN THE LAW OF COMMANDMENTS (TORAH) contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace

Saul of Tarsus does NOT MINCE WORDS here. He lets us know beyond the shadow of a doubt that he believes Torah has been abolished and done away. If he is correct, sin has ALSO been abolished and done away, because sin (according to I John 3:4) is the transgression of something (that according to Saul of Tarsus) has been done away! Which makes the purpose for GRACE, invalid, vacant, blank and impotent.

☝️☝️☝️ These are but a handful of reasons why we CANNOT take Saul of Tarsus (or Barnabas) seriously. Saul of Tarsus isn’t ‘hard to be understood’ by serious bible students. He is easily understood to be a fraudulent, liar and deceiver.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *